Titlebook: Husserl’s Ideen; Lester Embree,Thomas Nenon Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Alfred Schutz.Aron Gurwitsch.Edmund H

credit

書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen被引頻次




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen年度引用




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen讀者反饋




書目名稱Husserl’s Ideen讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

一起

Reading and Rereading the , in Japanany to study under Husserl, and subsequently Heidegger. These and others built the foundation for a robust Japanese phenomenological tradition that focuses on extensive text critique on one hand, and on links with Asian thought on the other. The century-long encounter with phenomenology has resulted

琺瑯

Edith Stein and Autismisplays structures of intentionality, meanings that autistic persons make are available through their gestures, sounds and language to an empathetic pairing partner. While still Husserl’s student, Edith Stein wrote the book on the nature and practice of empathy. Her insights allow us to recognize co

rods366

Ludwig Ferdinand Clauss and Racializationogy had made possible for the first time a rigorous concept of race. He subsequently became one of the foremost racial theorists in Nazi Germany. This essay explores what is problematic in Clauss’s approach, but the main emphasis is on what we learn from Clauss about the project of a phenomenology o

向宇宙

平躺

jettison

thrombosis

The Spanish-Speaking World and José Vasconcelosiod of enthusiasm and a second period of sounder study but less creativity—, a second section makes a review of José Vasconcelos’ proposal of a “paradisiac thinking” and an “inverted .”, developed to oppose the phenomenological reduction and its disregard of concrete reality. The contrast between Va

incision

排斥

Martin Heidegger and Grounding of Ethicsclosely aligned with Husserl’s phenomenological project. It then shows how a fundamental difference emerged over the question of what the ultimate grounds for action. When Heidegger says that Husserl has failed to address the real question about the meaning of Being, he is referring to the meaning o