Titlebook: Humean Bodies and their Consequences; Ruth Weintraub Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to

Boldfaced

書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Humean Bodies and their Consequences讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

BILIO

Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/429927.jpg

GRIPE

conifer

Humean Bodies and their Consequences978-3-031-50799-1Series ISSN 2524-4248 Series E-ISSN 2524-4256

Champion

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50799-1David Hume; A Treatise of Human Nature; semantic Idealism; spatiality; disunity of space; causation; metho

gospel

The Idealist Interpretation Renders Hume More of an Empiricistis on the Idealist reading, and that on several interpretations of his methodological view, the Materialist reading renders his intellectual conduct less consistent with the epistemology he endorses than does the Idealist reading.

Enervate

反對(duì)

Improving on Hume’s Account of the Way We Generalise from Experiences Hume has it, inferring causally (inductively). This prepares the way to my argument, in the following chapters, in support of the claim that the two readings, Idealism and Materialism, impact scepticism about ampliative reasoning differentially.

強(qiáng)制性

Arguments for the Idealist Interpretationacterising the belief in “bodies” suggest (after some interpretative work) that we can only think of perceptions. Third, I show that some of the argumentative moves he makes, for instance in his discussion of Nominalism, much better comport with the Idealist interpretation.

光滑