找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Human-Robot Interaction; Evaluation Methods a Céline Jost,Brigitte Le Pévédic,Nicole Mirnig Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 H

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Disclose
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:03:34 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 04:13:47 | 只看該作者
Advice to New Human-Robot Interaction Researchers revolutions in experimental psychology: the “replication crisis” was one of the most seminal moments in psychology and its repercussions are felt far and wide, including in HRI. This chapter lists some of the important mistakes often made in HRI studies and suggest practical recommendations for better research studies.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 07:28:45 | 只看該作者
A Survey on Current Practices in User Evaluation of Companion Robotstarget group. This chapter reviews research methods applied during the evaluation of companion robots and provides details on the implemented methods, involved target groups, test settings and evaluation aims. Typical pitfalls and methodological challenges are discussed and recommendations for the planning of future user evaluations are given.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 10:05:21 | 只看該作者
Der Vater als Vorleser und Lesevorbildnd developed an enhanced version of the USUS framework in order to include UX goals that we denoted the USUS Goals evaluation framework. Besides the modified framework, some recommendations are presented that may contribute to the ongoing work of integrating UX in the HRI field.
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:24:50 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85040-9ponses, we mainly observed three different systems of thought which all lead to the same conclusion that seems to be a strong consensus that all research questions can be answered with a comparative study.
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:08:40 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:42:23 | 只看該作者
Designing Evaluations: Researchers’ Insights Interview of Five Expertsponses, we mainly observed three different systems of thought which all lead to the same conclusion that seems to be a strong consensus that all research questions can be answered with a comparative study.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:57:20 | 只看該作者
Book 2020ommonly used evaluation methods, and shows that they are not always suitable for this purpose. Using representative case studies, the book identifies good and bad practices for evaluating human-robot interactions and proposes new standardized processes as well as recommendations, carefully developed
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:55:48 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:39:50 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 09:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
邳州市| 长武县| 织金县| 南昌市| 奉新县| 平南县| 江永县| 环江| 灵武市| 西平县| 新蔡县| 安多县| 沁源县| 宜兰县| 万载县| 黑水县| 开化县| 甘洛县| 墨江| 梨树县| 扶绥县| 塔城市| 灵寿县| 太仆寺旗| 赤壁市| 云浮市| 普格县| 余干县| 渑池县| 分宜县| 云南省| 云龙县| 伊宁县| 柳州市| 滕州市| 六安市| 武义县| 嵊州市| 太仆寺旗| 共和县| 宁蒗|