Titlebook: Human Rights in the Emerging Global Order; A New Sovereignty? Kurt Mills Book 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers L

Cardiac-Output

The Quest for Community: Internal Challenges to Sovereignty,t. The previous chapter briefly discussed the role various kinds of nationalism, ethnic conflict and separatism are playing in undermining current conceptions of sovereignty and proposed a new role for substate communities in reconstructing sovereignty. This chapter will delve more deeply into what

報復

Permeable Borders: Human Migration,nt of sovereignty: ‘The power to admit or exclude aliens is inherent in sovereignty and essential for any political community.’. This conceptual abstraction is reified by such phenomena as border patrols and passports. Border patrols attempt to keep out the undesirables and passports help to regulat

GLIDE

orthopedist

The Institutional Foundations of the New Sovereignty,spective I have argued that sovereignty includes an obligation to uphold basic human rights, popular sovereignty and self-determination. In practice, the international community has taken a wide variety of actions, however ambiguous, which indicate a shift in the balance between sovereignty and huma

軌道

Concluding Observations on the New Sovereignty,GOs, global telecommunications, widespread communal conflict, and large-scale environmental and humanitarian disasters have all contributed to a sense that some of the questions regarding the very basis of the international community which many had thought were settled, especially with respect to th

編輯才信任

Kurt Millsntersucht. Komparative Studien über Unterschiede bzw. Gemeinsamkeiten im Beschaffungsverhalten der beiden Nachfragergruppen existieren hingegen kaum. Die Ursache dafür mag darin liegen, da? sowohl von Wissenschaftlern als auch in der Praxis die Merkmale der Beschaffungssituationen und - Objekte sowi

escalate

Benign

察覺

Methodological Stare Decisis and Constitutional Interpretation,rt claims to presumptively follow the substantive results of its prior constitutional decisions, it has never considered itself bound by the interpretive approaches (e.g., originalism, textualism, or “l(fā)iving constitutionalism”) used to reach those decisions. The author suggests an explanation for th

友好