Titlebook: Human Dignity and the Autonomy of Law; José Manuel Aroso Linhares,Manuel Atienza Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

tattle

Guileless

compose

得罪

上腭

Between Principles and Rules.: if we understand Law as a set of commands assisted by sanctions, this, firstly, certainly does not enhance the dignity of the subjects of the Law, who are conceived as passive recipients of orders. Secondly, it leads to separating Law from Moral, which cannot be coerced, but drives us also to ima

確定無疑

西瓜

The Double Sense of the Law-Dignity Relationship in Emmanuel Levinasty, with the I’s respect for the other as other, even before the advent of positive law; or, it can derive from a social condition demanding respect, even obedience from others, dignity connected with a high office, with authority, social position. The law defends a role, social position, juridical

勾引

Human Rights, Rights of the Other, and Preventive Peace: A Levinasian Perspective96). Particularly interesting on this account is his 1985 essay, “The Rights of Man and the Rights of the Other”. With this distinction Levinas evidences how as the rights of identity, human rights do not include the rights of the other. The relationship with the face of the other is a relationship

expansive

No Argument: Human Dignity and the Making of Legislationntion. Jeremy Waldron’s engagement, since 1999 when . and . were published, with the democratic and constitutional practice and with the theoretical argument constitutes a rich source of legal, political and social analysis of human dignity. Waldron’s own literature demonstrates that, as an “essenti

Outmoded

Is Dignity a Non-contingent Autonomously Juridical “Idea”? A , with Jeremy Waldron more to learn from law than vice versa.” (Waldron). The . which follows endeavours to clarify this assumption, less however in order to reconstitute the “place” of dignity in Jeremy Waldron’s conception of Law (as a decisive component of his defence of normative or ethical positivism and the corres