Titlebook: Hugo Grotius in International Thought; Renée Jeffery Book 2006 Renée Jeffery 2006 international relations.morality.Political Thought

Alacrity

書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Hugo Grotius in International Thought讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Amorous

Hugo Grotius and Twentieth-Century International Relations,ding in international legal thought, in the second half of the twentieth century, Grotius became almost exclusively discussed within the admittedly porous and ill-defined bounds of (predominantly British) International Relations.

CROW

HATCH

Grotian Morality in Europe and Beyond,That this was the case is certainly hinted at in a letter to Grotius from magistrate M. Bignon dated March 5, 1632:.Of course, the “great king” who always had a copy of . at hand was King Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden who, as legend has it, slept with a copy of the work under his pillow.

ethereal

變形詞

The Grotius Story,rists. His 1625 work . is rightly counted alongside Hobbes’ . and Kant’s . as one of the most important “classics” of international thought.. The exemplar of the so-called “rationalist” tradition of international theory, Grotius is often viewed as mediating the contending claims of the “realist” and

keloid

Petechiae

Grotian Morality in Europe and Beyond,l Malcolm writes, his “intellectual and theological respectability … was so great that he achieved an almost talismanic status” among proponents of the law of nature.. In particular, not only was . “reprinted or translated fifty times between 1625 and 1758”. but, as Lord Blanesburgh remarked in a sp

先鋒派

The Grotian Tradition in International Thought, first is the Dutch scholar Cornelius van Vollenhoven whose 1918 . sought to defend Grotius’ work against the “misshapen conglomeration of hypocrisy and cynicism” that was, in his view, Vattel’s ... The second figure is Hersch Lauterpacht whose 1946 work “The Grotian Tradition in International Law”

灰心喪氣

Hugo Grotius and Twentieth-Century International Relations,gure of the field’s heritage. In the majority of textbooks on the subject he is relegated to the annals of history, a figure skipped over with relative brevity in introductory overviews of the history of modern international law. Among the few international legal theorists of the late twentieth cent