| 書目名稱 | How to Think about Meaning |
| 編輯 | Paul Saka |
| 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/429/428850/428850.mp4 |
| 概述 | Challenges truth-conditional semantics.Develops a cognitivist or mentalist theory of meaning.Examines the nature of hate speech.Examines the nature of ambiguity.Proposes a new solution to the semantic |
| 叢書名稱 | Philosophical Studies Series |
| 圖書封面 |  |
| 描述 | .According to the dominant theory of meaning, truth-conditional semantics, to explain the meaning of a statement is to specify the conditions necessary and sufficient for its truth. Classical truth-conditional semantics is coming under increasing attack, however, from contextualists and inferentialists, who agree that meaning is located in the mind...How to Think about Meaning develops an even more radical mentalist semantics, which it does by shifting the object of semantic inquiry. Whereas for classical semantics the object of analysis is an abstract sentence or utterance such as “Grass is green”, for attitudinal semantics the object of inquiry is a propositional attitude such as “Speaker so-and-so thinks grass is green”. Explicit relativization to some speaker S allows for semantic theory then to make contact with psychology, sociology, historical linguistics, and other empirical disciplines.. |
| 出版日期 | Book 2007 |
| 關(guān)鍵詞 | Hate speech; Linguistics; Philosophy of language; Semantics; issue; semantic; truth |
| 版次 | 1 |
| doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5857-8 |
| isbn_softcover | 978-90-481-7460-7 |
| isbn_ebook | 978-1-4020-5857-8Series ISSN 0921-8599 Series E-ISSN 2542-8349 |
| issn_series | 0921-8599 |
| copyright | Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 |
|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國(guó)際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-8 00:19
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:25:33
