找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: How Philosophers Argue; An Adversarial Colla Fernando Leal,Hubert Marraud Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 9400|回復(fù): 57
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:32:11 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱How Philosophers Argue
副標(biāo)題An Adversarial Colla
編輯Fernando Leal,Hubert Marraud
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/429/428676/428676.mp4
概述Is the first step-by-step analysis of a long argumentative dialogue.Contrasts two different argumentation theories as applied to the same argumentative dialogue.Examines the most famous philosophical
叢書名稱Argumentation Library
圖書封面Titlebook: How Philosophers Argue; An Adversarial Colla Fernando Leal,Hubert Marraud Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under
描述.This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording..The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument
出版日期Book 2022
關(guān)鍵詞Philosophical Argumentation; Metaphilosophy; Pragma-dialectics; Argumentation in Context; Traditional Ph
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-85370-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-85368-6Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
issn_series 1566-7650
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱How Philosophers Argue影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue被引頻次




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue年度引用




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue讀者反饋




書目名稱How Philosophers Argue讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:30:35 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:13:50 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:30:16 | 只看該作者
Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston’s Moral Argumentourism. Although noticeable points of contact appear now and then, none of the debaters take advantage of them and so the debate on the moral argument is as inconclusive as that on the metaphysical argument.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:03:37 | 只看該作者
Argument Dialectiche logical perspective understands and evaluates arguments as products that people create. My analysis is logical in that it focuses on intra. and inter.argumentative relations, and at the same time it is dialectical in that it places at the core the relations of opposition between arguments.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:16:54 | 只看該作者
Argumentation Structures and Operations simple or complex. Thus, e.g. the operation of concatenation yields a subordinative argument. The successive interventions of the participants in an argumentative exchange can be seen as applications of these operations, by means of which participants interactively weave a macro-argument in the course of an argumentative exchange.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:52:48 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:33:19 | 只看該作者
Co-Oriented Reasons and Modifierson stand of fall independently of one another, whereas in conjunction reasons add up. Consequently, disjunction may be a reply either to an objection or a rebuttal of an argument, while conjunction may be a reply to a refutation.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:00:31 | 只看該作者
Intertwined Structurestive exchange. Every countermove amounts to the application of an operation that produces a new argumentative structure. In this way, an abstract structure formed by arguments and counter-arguments can be extracted from the argumentative process.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:29:52 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 02:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
勐海县| 崇仁县| 买车| 永兴县| 八宿县| 即墨市| 敖汉旗| 韩城市| 石城县| 遂川县| 普洱| 正镶白旗| 新郑市| 阳山县| 高雄县| 扎鲁特旗| 合山市| 阿图什市| 乌拉特前旗| 宜城市| 梧州市| 三门峡市| 临沧市| 云林县| 措美县| 儋州市| 四川省| 常宁市| 永春县| 台安县| 鄂温| 蒙自县| 双峰县| 运城市| 保德县| 永顺县| 延庆县| 铜鼓县| 江孜县| 白山市| 天等县|