Titlebook: Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks; Michael Elazar Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media

召集會議

書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks被引頻次




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks年度引用




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks讀者反饋




書目名稱Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Induction

Honoré Fabri and the Concept of Impetus: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks978-94-007-1605-6Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942

宿醉

Methodology and Main Textsing theorems, i.e. causal physical propositions, on the basis of fundamental truths – definitions, axioms and “hypotheses” (which rely directly on sense experience). This chapter also presents and briefly describes Fabri’s works that are the most important in the context of this book: . (1646), . (1648), and – to a lesser extent – . (1669).

COMMA

climax

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1605-6Galileo Galilei; Honoré Fabri; Inertia; Jesuits; René Descartes

領(lǐng)巾

emulsify

judiciousness

Irascible

Book 2011 Jesuit scientists during the period between Galileo‘s death (1642) and Newton‘s Principia (1687). It shows how Fabri, while remaining loyal to a general Aristotelian outlook, managed to reinterpret the old concept of “impetus” in such a way as to assimilate into his physics building blocks of moder

FANG

Book 2011y considered as a dogmatic rejection of the New Science, not essentially different from the medieval impetus theory. This book shows how New Science principles were taught in Jesuit Colleges in the 1640s, thus depicting the sophisticated manner in which new ideas were settling within the lion’s den of Catholic education.