Titlebook: Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety; David John Dickson Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusi

Agitated

書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety被引頻次




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety年度引用




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety讀者反饋




書目名稱Holocaust Fiction and the Question of Impiety讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

殘忍

http://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/427913.jpg

CHART

978-3-031-12396-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl

疏忽

錯誤

領(lǐng)帶

ing from 1961 to 2018.Argues that ‘impious‘ victim-oriented .This book discusses the issues underlying contemporary Holocaust fiction. Using Gillian Rose’s theory of Holocaust piety, it argues that, rather than enhancing our understanding of the Holocaust, contemporary fiction has instead become ove

不整齊

愉快么

David John Dicksonn Gesamtsituation dar. Zwar lassen sich die derzeitigen Probleme nicht mit denen des Wahljahres 1969 vergleichen. Nichtsdestoweniger werden die Entscheidungen von 1976 mittelfristig für die F.D.P. von ?hnlich existenzieller Bedeutung sein. Die Irritation, die von den heimlichen Dissidenten der SPD/F

樣式

滴注