找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: History of Rationalities; Ways of Thinking fro Luca Sciortino Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

[復制鏈接]
查看: 25455|回復: 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:50:02 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱History of Rationalities
副標題Ways of Thinking fro
編輯Luca Sciortino
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/428/427587/427587.mp4
概述A comparative analysis of the different notions of ‘ways of thinking’ introduced by philosophers.A guiding thread running through historical epistemology in an attempt to unify the researches of its a
圖書封面Titlebook: History of Rationalities; Ways of Thinking fro Luca Sciortino Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li
描述.Over time, philosophers and historians of science have introduced different notions of ‘ways of thinking‘. This book presents, compares, and contrasts these different notions. It focuses primarily on Ian Hacking’s idea of ‘style of reasoning‘ in order to assess and develop it into a more systematic theory of scientific thought, arguing that Hacking’s theory implies epistemic relativism. Luca Sciortino also discusses the implications of Hacking’s ideas for the study of the problem of contingency and inevitability in the development of scientific knowledge.
出版日期Book 2023
關鍵詞Historical epistemology; way of thinking; Ian Hacking; styles of reasoning; relativism; contingency; incom
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24004-1
isbn_softcover978-3-031-24006-5
isbn_ebook978-3-031-24004-1
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱History of Rationalities影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱History of Rationalities影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱History of Rationalities網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱History of Rationalities網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱History of Rationalities被引頻次




書目名稱History of Rationalities被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱History of Rationalities年度引用




書目名稱History of Rationalities年度引用學科排名




書目名稱History of Rationalities讀者反饋




書目名稱History of Rationalities讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:20:56 | 只看該作者
epistemology in an attempt to unify the researches of its a.Over time, philosophers and historians of science have introduced different notions of ‘ways of thinking‘. This book presents, compares, and contrasts these different notions. It focuses primarily on Ian Hacking’s idea of ‘style of reasoni
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:08:14 | 只看該作者
,Notions of the Concept of ‘Ways of Thinking’: From Classical Historical Epistemology to Kuhn, notions capture different channels through which objectivity becomes possible, it will be possible to group them in the same genus within historical epistemology and say that all these frameworks provide a ‘history of objectivity’.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:34:39 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:50:28 | 只看該作者
,Notions of the Concept of ‘Ways of Thinking’: From Hacking to Daston and Galison,toricize Kant. I shall also show that there are substantial convergences between the styles project and Daston and Galison’s study on objectivity. Finally, following Williams’s account of truth and truthfulness, I shall argue that styles of reasoning are ways of telling the truth and ways of looking at the world.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:26:54 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:31:54 | 只看該作者
,Developing the ‘Styles Project’: Towards a ‘Theory of Styles of Reasoning’,of reasoning. Finally, I shall argue that there are other ways of thinking that differ from styles of reasoning in the sense of Hacking. What I consider a relevant difference is that only styles of reasoning have strong techniques of self-authentication, techniques that are intrinsic to their forms of reasoning.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:31:48 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:21:57 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:55:19 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24004-1Historical epistemology; way of thinking; Ian Hacking; styles of reasoning; relativism; contingency; incom
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 02:14
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
荣昌县| 南漳县| 阳春市| 遵化市| 丰城市| 满城县| 田林县| 睢宁县| 凤山县| 海原县| 南昌县| 海口市| 吴堡县| 安达市| 获嘉县| 雅安市| 理塘县| 望谟县| 通海县| 广安市| 鄄城县| 上思县| 高唐县| 利津县| 桃源县| 玉林市| 石家庄市| 高清| 宝坻区| 高陵县| 横峰县| 阜新市| 报价| 顺平县| 盐津县| 逊克县| 县级市| 行唐县| 蒙阴县| 馆陶县| 苍山县|