Titlebook: Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation; A Controversial Lega Ramses Delafontaine Book 2015 Springer International Pu

ominous

書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation被引頻次




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation年度引用




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation讀者反饋




書目名稱Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

duplicate

受辱

Introduction Part IIIians testifying for the tobacco industry remaining silent about their involvement while making hundreds of thousands of dollars through delivering doubtful historical research on the actions committed by the tobacco companies which Judge Kessler described as .; forensic history in tobacco litigation remains a controversial practice.

顧客

Debates: Reflections in Academic and National Mediaexamined who the protagonists of these debates were and what their arguments were. The debate revolves around already familiar problems of advocacy, objectivity, “hired guns”, but also on an attempt by the tobacco industry to censure plaintiffs’ experts Proctor and Kyriakoudes in 2009.

Exonerate

Historians in Tobacco Litigation, a Conclusione role of historians as an expert judicial witnesses in tobacco litigation as a controversial legal practice in general and on three specific points: advocacy, ethics, and transparency. For this chapter, I drew from my qualitative as well as quantitative analyses on the involvement of historians as expert judicial witnesses in tobacco litigation.

placebo-effect

Tobacco and Health: Towards a Contemporary Perspectiveapter furthermore considers the 1964 Surgeon General Report on smoking. Lastly this second chapter covers the industry’s ability to evade litigation and government oversight through well-funded lobbying networks.

finite

The Tobacco Industry and Its Tacticssy on smoking despite the fact that the tobacco companies’ own scientists had convincing evidence to the contrary. These tactics by the tobacco industry are key elements of the testimony of expert historians in tobacco litigation today.

空氣傳播

怎樣才咆哮

2198-9842 cases, including recent tobacco litigation in the United St.Historian Ramses Delafontaine presents an engaging examination of a controversial legal practice: the historian as an expert judicial witness. This book focuses on tobacco litigation in the U.S. wherein 50 historians have witnessed in 314

細(xì)微的差異