找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Herodotean Inquiries; Seth Benardete Book 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1969 Athen.Herodotus.Sparta

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 12978|回復(fù): 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:27:04 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries
編輯Seth Benardete
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/426/425935/425935.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Herodotean Inquiries;  Seth Benardete Book 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1969 Athen.Herodotus.Sparta
描述Herodotus has so often been called, since ancient times, the father of history that this title has blinded us to the question: Was the father of history an historian? Everyone knows that the Greek word from which ‘history‘ is derived always means inquiry in Herodotus. His so-called Histories are in- quiries, and by that name I have preferred to call them. His inquiries partly result in the presentation of events that are now called ‘historical‘; but other parts of his inquiry would now belong to the province of the anthro- pologist or geographer. Herodotus does not recognize these fields as distinct; they all belong equally to the subject of his inquiry, but it is not self-evident what he understands to be his subject: the notorious difficulties in the proemium are enough to indicate this. If his work presents us with so strange a mixture of different fields, we are entitled to ask: Did Herodotus under- stand even its historical element as we understand it? Without any proof everyone, as far as I am aware, who has studied him has assumed this to be so.
出版日期Book 1969
關(guān)鍵詞Athen; Herodotus; Sparta
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3161-5
isbn_softcover978-90-247-0015-8
isbn_ebook978-94-010-3161-5
copyrightMartinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1969
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Herodotean Inquiries讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:53:51 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:58:27 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:48:39 | 只看該作者
Athens,ves under the yoke and drew it forty-five stades to the sanctuary; for which they obtained the “best end of life,” since “god showed in their case that it is better for a man to die than live.” The Argive men “blessed the strength of the youths,” the Argive women their mother; who “joyful at their d
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:49:23 | 只看該作者
Sparta,ess” (?γνωμοσ?νη), which Herodotus accuses them of, did not consist in their wishing to be free, but in the way they believed it could be brought about. In rejecting Hecataeus’ proposal to finance a large navy from the dedications of Croesus, they had shown their ignorance of the half-truth that mon
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:55:44 | 只看該作者
Persia and Greece,mplemented by the other two, was subject to. The Persians relied too heavily on a specious λ?γο?, which led them to underestimate the Athenians, whose perfect understanding of what confronted them seemed to stand in need of no accounting. It so exactly conformed with the situation that, if the previ
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:19:00 | 只看該作者
Book 1969lties in the proemium are enough to indicate this. If his work presents us with so strange a mixture of different fields, we are entitled to ask: Did Herodotus under- stand even its historical element as we understand it? Without any proof everyone, as far as I am aware, who has studied him has assumed this to be so.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:42:41 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:01:28 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:11:11 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 00:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
陵川县| 建瓯市| 贵德县| 伊宁县| 靖州| 龙游县| 清流县| 梁平县| 新干县| 鄂托克旗| 民和| 东源县| 江安县| 星子县| 桑日县| 乐东| 东安县| 双辽市| 嵊州市| 苍溪县| 沂水县| 沁阳市| 苍南县| 磐安县| 绵竹市| 昭觉县| 广西| 崇州市| 南部县| 嘉鱼县| 义马市| 石城县| 将乐县| 荃湾区| 大庆市| 石阡县| 萝北县| 阿图什市| 庆元县| 夹江县| 彝良县|