找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Harmony and Paradox; Intensional Aspects Luca Tranchini Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2024 Proof-theor

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 18447|回復(fù): 39
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:05:22 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox
副標(biāo)題Intensional Aspects
編輯Luca Tranchini
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/425/424335/424335.mp4
概述Discloses the significance of identity of proofs for proof-theoretic semantics.Offers the tools for analyzing (hyper-)intensional‘features of the meaning of logical constants.Develops a philosophical
叢書(shū)名稱Trends in Logic
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Harmony and Paradox; Intensional Aspects  Luca Tranchini Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2024 Proof-theor
描述This open access book investigates the role played by?.identity?of proofs.?in proof-theoretic semantics. It develops a conception of proof-theoretic semantics as primarily concerned with the relationship between proofs (understood as abstract entities) and derivations (the linguistic representations of proofs). It demonstrates that identity of proof is a key both to clarify some —still not wholly understood— notions at the core of proof-theoretic semantics, such as?.harmony.; and to broaden the range of the phenomena which can be analyzed using the tools of this semantic paradigm, so as to include for instance?.paradoxes...The volume covers topics such as the philosophical significance of different criteria of identity of proofs, and adequacy conditions for an intensional account of the notion of harmony. The author also examines the Prawitz-Tennant analysis of paradoxes by investigating on the one hand the prospectsof turning it into a theory of meaning for paradoxical languages, and on the other hand two distinct kinds of phenomena, first observed by Crabbe and Ekman, showing that the Tennant-Prawitz criterion for paradoxicality overgenerates. This volume is of interest to schola
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024
關(guān)鍵詞Proof-theoretic semantics; Identity of proofs; Proof-theoretic harmony; Paradox and proof-theory; Proof
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46921-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-46923-7
isbn_ebook978-3-031-46921-3Series ISSN 1572-6126 Series E-ISSN 2212-7313
issn_series 1572-6126
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2024
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Harmony and Paradox讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:41:35 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:07:12 | 只看該作者
Luca Tranchinince of the “Workshop on Agile Sustainability” at the XP 2022 conference shows. However, when supporting the sustainability sector, agile practitioners are likely to encounter Theory of Change, and they will need to understand it. Thus, this paper provides an overview of Theory of Change and identifi
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:33:46 | 只看該作者
months, with two workshops and several bilateral in-depth sessions. First results are presented and discussed in order to derive design principles for the Information Requirement Concept for a XaaS application in emerging data ecosystems.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:33:59 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:10:47 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:42:04 | 只看該作者
Harmony via Reductions and Expansionsdeduction, harmony can be explained by making reference to certain transformations on derivations, called reductions and expansions. Reductions are a key ingredient of the proof of normalization for the calculus of natural deduction for intuitionistic logic. In this calculus, normal derivations that
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:13:57 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:47:59 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:27:50 | 只看該作者
Paradoxes: A Natural Deduction Approachght into normal form, due to “l(fā)oops” arising in the process of reduction. After presenting Prawitz’ original formulation of Russell’s paradox, we introduce a simplified presentation of it, and then discuss the relevance of the difference between intuitionistic and classical logic and of structural p
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 22:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
浦江县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 尖扎县| 资源县| 天祝| 钟祥市| 禄丰县| 华安县| 定南县| 泸水县| 娱乐| 满洲里市| 辽阳市| 信丰县| 长宁区| 鄂托克前旗| 阳西县| 城口县| 宁南县| 嘉黎县| 陕西省| 巴塘县| 长沙县| 册亨县| 墨江| 扶余县| 客服| 师宗县| 修武县| 永和县| 潜山县| 华阴市| 安义县| 盈江县| 呼伦贝尔市| 吐鲁番市| 延安市| 肃南| 右玉县| 安宁市| 定西市|