找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine; Thomas Schramme,Steven Edwards Reference work 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 30230|回復(fù): 59
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:04:49 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine
編輯Thomas Schramme,Steven Edwards
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/423/422422/422422.mp4
概述The first comprehensive, multi-authored handbook in the field of philosophy of medicine.Contains articles written by distinguished specialists from multiple disciplines, including philosophy, health s
圖書封面Titlebook: Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine;  Thomas Schramme,Steven Edwards Reference work 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
描述.This is the first wide-ranging, multi-authored handbook in the field of philosophy of medicine, covering the underlying conceptual issues of many important social, political and ethical issues in health care. It introduces and develops over 70 topics, concepts, and issues in the field. It is written by distinguished specialists from multiple disciplines, including philosophy, health sciences, nursing, sociology, political theory, and medicine. Many difficult social and ethical issues in health care are based on conceptual problems, most prominently on the definitions of health and disease, or on epistemological issues regarding causality or diagnosis. Philosophy is the discipline that deals with such conceptual, metaphysical, epistemological, methodological, and axiological matters. This handbook covers all the central concepts in medicine, such as ageing, death, disease, mental disorder, and well-being. It is an invaluable source for laypeople, academics with an interest in medicine, and health care specialists who want be informed and up to date with the relevant discussions. The text also advances these debates and will set the agenda for years to come. .
出版日期Reference work 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Bioethics; Disease; Health; Medicine; Philosophy; basic aspects of health care; concepts in health care; co
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1
isbn_ebook978-94-017-8688-1
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature B.V. 201
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine被引頻次




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine年度引用




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine讀者反饋




書目名稱Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:16:54 | 只看該作者
Thomas Schrammeptance literature. We argue that social acceptance research should look more into (1) social conflict as a multi-actor process, (2) as a process of participation, (3) as a process in which multiple conflicts interact. We finish the chapter with a discussion on the implications for research on social acceptance.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:32:45 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:29:34 | 只看該作者
Goals of Medicinehapter also discusses the concept of medicine and scrutinizes whether it has any bearing on the debate regarding the goals of medicine. It is argued that the goals of medicine are still contested and will probably remain so. They cannot be used in a direct way to solve normative questions regarding the proper use of medicine.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:11:25 | 只看該作者
Reference work 2017ortant social, political and ethical issues in health care. It introduces and develops over 70 topics, concepts, and issues in the field. It is written by distinguished specialists from multiple disciplines, including philosophy, health sciences, nursing, sociology, political theory, and medicine. M
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:23:32 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:11:40 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:40:34 | 只看該作者
Havi Carelcles by harnessing the vitality of “renewable resources”. This means widening the lens of renewable energy’s “social acceptance” research to understand the socio-ecological chain of costs for fossil fuel+ development.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:06:36 | 只看該作者
Derek Sellmaner things, issues of materiality, social location and norms. We provide empirical examples of specific approaches for doing such work (e.g. question wording, experimental design) and make recommendations for a more fulsome engagement with critical approaches within a more positivist paradigm of data gathering.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:55:16 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 15:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
平谷区| 莱芜市| 克拉玛依市| 江都市| 大化| 腾冲县| 泸定县| 肇源县| 清镇市| 鹰潭市| 石景山区| 当涂县| 龙川县| 香河县| 阿荣旗| 安庆市| 云霄县| 五指山市| 长沙市| 启东市| 德安县| 睢宁县| 西藏| 罗平县| 芒康县| 渝中区| 漳州市| 太保市| 德格县| 吉林省| 堆龙德庆县| 游戏| 南乐县| 黎平县| 株洲县| 兴义市| 都昌县| 衡南县| 镇远县| 大荔县| 无极县|