Titlebook: Handbook of Potentiality; Kristina Engelhard,Michael Quante Book 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 A

nepotism

Potentialities in the Philosophy of Mindsis’, the idea that ‘.’: What distinguishes a mind from a system which is not a mind is just its potential; to have certain potentials is to have (or to be) a mind. Potentials, in the end, come down to dispositions. Faculties are sub-systems of minds that bestow certain dispositions. But the potenti

座右銘

個(gè)人長(zhǎng)篇演說

芭蕾舞女演員

結(jié)束

l projection in clause complexing (at clause complex level), that is the logico-semantic relations between the projecting clause and the projected clause, with a view to identifying similarities and differences in the two Chinese translations. In Sect.?., two Chinese translations of verbal clause co

GULP

Frans A. J. de Haasn of simplicity, deliberation, and power. They usually balance on the verge of two disciplines, data-analysis and foundational measurement, or statistics and psychology. To me, unfolding has always been one of them. The theory and the original methodology were created by Clyde Coombs (1912-1988) to

interior

n a model of the theory and a model of data, such as the likelihood of the data as a function of the model. To compare (models of) two theories, one can turn to a statistical test — a likelihood ratio test, for example — if the model of one theory can be considered as a submodel of the model of a se

Accomplish

放肆的我

Stephan Schmid, restricted to pr- lems of statistical estimation), my aim is to provide ideas and examples which will assist a statistician, or a statistical practitioner, in comparing the performance one can expect from using either Bayesian or classical (aka, frequentist) solutions in - timation problems. Befor