Titlebook: Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation; Giorgio Bongiovanni,Gerald Postema,Douglas Walton Book 2018 Springer Nature B.V. 2018 Basic

constellation

ECG769

Norms in Action: A Logical Perspectivethe law’s prescriptions and act accordingly. A connection between law and action is assumed by the most diverse approaches to the law; when no reference is made to this connection it is since it appears to be an obvious truism. Let us list just a few examples where this connection appears most clear

forebear

信任

非秘密

The Goals of Normsing of norms without a modeling of how Ns work in our mind and how do they cut or .. They are built for that. Thus, a sophisticated ontology of goals is necessary (endogenous vs. exogenous, desires, intentions, motives, pseudogoals, etc.). Ns also . (they are aimed at achieving certain social outcom

PHIL

Authorityith respect to the kind of reasons their directives or opinions create. Epistemic authority is distinguished from practical authority in that the former is the source of reasons to believe and the latter is the source of reasons for action. Both kinds of authority are of considerable philosophical i

影響深遠(yuǎn)

有害處

Decline

Defeasibility in Law introduces the idea of nonmonotonic reasoning. It then focuses on defeasible argumentation, considering how defeasible arguments can be constructed and how they can be defeated by rebutting and undercutting counterarguments. The dialectical interactions of defeasible arguments are further explored

Slit-Lamp

Analogical Argumentsic relation, an act of cognition, and a kind of argument. I then proceed to provide a general characterization of arguments from analogy and identify four essential aspects thereof: the problem situation, . similarity, relevant similarity, and the solution. In the remaining part of the chapter, I an