Titlebook: Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy; Julien Chaisse,Le?la Choukroune,Sufian Jusoh Living reference work 20200th edition I

PEL

書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy被引頻次




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy年度引用




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy讀者反饋




書目名稱Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Flustered

Performance Requirement Prohibitions in International Investment Law,to digital trade. It suggests that the developmental potential of performance requirements must not be ignored as new disciplines governing their use are developed in line with changes to the modern global economy.

hazard

要求比…更好

Non-precluded Measures Clauses: Regime, Trends, and Practice,rpretive ambiguities that can accompany NPM clauses. Indeed, it will be argued that while NPM clauses do raise some difficulties with respect to extending the policy space of contracting parties, they are relatively effective in ensuring that public policy is a permanent feature of arbitrators’ matr

indecipherable

The Standard of Most-Favored-Nation Treatment in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Practice,s been greater harmonization of investment treaty protections..The historically vague expression of MFN treatment in treaties has effectively shifted interpretive authority from the state party to treaties to private arbitrators. Meanwhile, different expressions of MFN treatment in treaties and the

Obvious

Essential Security Interests in International Investment Law: A Tale of Two ISDS Claims Against Indhat the two Indian cases make useful contributions to the evolving jurisprudence on the security reservation on all the issues identified above. The tribunals make?vital additions on matters like meaning of ‘necessary’ and on ‘standard of review,’ which would be useful for future tribunals while int

按等級

,“One-Stop” Commercial Dispute Resolution Services: Implications for International Investment Law,and court judgments and mediated settlement agreements, on the other. A narrower enforceability gap would reduce the significance of one of the key advantages of international arbitration: an unmatched global enforcement regime. The diminished significance of that advantage likely would place additi

窗簾等

Public Participation: Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration,does not undermine the purposes of the dispute settlement mechanism. In order to strike this balance, tribunals should only accept submissions from individuals or organizations who offer guarantees of independence, autonomy, and credibility.

Seizure

Arbitration Clauses Limited to Compensation due to Expropriation: Relevant Case Law, Interpretive T an analysis of China’s treaty policy and practice on this type of clauses and then synthesizes the relevant arbitral findings in cases that have arisen both out of Chinese and non-Chinese investment treaties. With specific regard to China, the conclusion is that interpretive inconsistencies on the

conflate

ICS from South East Asia Perspective,ent system which is called Investment Court System, and looking at the free trade agreement EU has entered with Canada, Vietnam, and Singapore, there is no doubt the provision will be more or less similar with those agreements. This system offers an improved mechanism of any investment dispute arise