Titlebook: Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design; Sources, Theory, Val Jeroen van den Hoven,Pieter E. Vermaas,Ibo van de Living refere

tooth-decay

Palate

Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer,arely linked to technology and design in philosophy and the social sciences. A few approaches to design for well-being have recently materialized, however, including Emotional Design, capability approaches, positive psychology approaches, and Life-Based Design. In this chapter, the notion of well-be

透明

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99155-3ay arise because the products and services have not been designed to allow for the full range of functional capabilities of the users who wish to use them. Medical conditions, accidents, ageing, or genetic predisposition means that most people will at some point experience functional impairments tha

AVERT

令人苦惱

Inkling

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03596-7to discourage looting) through to contemporary communities (such as the use by digital media providers of ‘digital rights management’ technology to prevent the unauthorised copying of digital data). But identifying what counts as a ‘regulatory’ purpose, however, is not entirely straightforward, larg

滔滔不絕的人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33807-7in this chapter we explore what designing for the value of responsibility could entail. The term “design for the value of responsibility” can be interpreted in (at least) two ways. First, it may be interpreted as a design activity that explicitly takes into account the effect of technological design

浮夸

oys simple design principles or rules of thumb such as inherent safety, multiple barriers, and numerical safety margins to reduce the risk of accidents. Probabilistic risk analysis combines the probabilities of individual events in event chains leading to accidents in order to identify design elemen

eczema

,Mario Markus: Pflicht und Kür,ability, however, designers have a higher level of ambition: additional to a high consumer value, they make sure that designs result in less degradation of our environment, less depletion of materials, and more social equity in our world. The need for a higher level of prosperity for people in devel

骯臟