Titlebook: Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design; Sources, Theory, Val Jeroen van den Hoven,Pieter E. Vermaas,Ibo van de Reference wor

CRP743

Design for Values: An Introduction,alities to the design process. An entrenched view on architecture is that “star” architects and designers somehow manage to realize their aesthetic and social goals in their design, thus imposing their values rather than allowing users and society to obtain buildings and artifacts that meet user and societal values.

可互換

整潔漂亮

ethical issues.Evaluates different application domains inclThis handbook enumerates?every aspect of incorporating moral and societal values into technology design, reflects the fact that the latter has moved on from strict functionality to become sensitive to moral and social values such as sustain

公式

Reference work 2015n from strict functionality to become sensitive to moral and social values such as sustainability and accountability. Aimed at a broad readership that includes ethicists, policy makers and designers themselves, it proffers a detailed survey of how technological, and institutional, design must now re

Sarcoma

是比賽

亞麻制品

善于

Technology Assessment and Design for Valueses), and TA for shaping technology directly (e.g., by constructive technology assessment or by . assessment). In all of these branches, TA is considering relations between technology and values. In particular, insofar as TA is involved in processes of shaping technology directly, there is a close neighborhood with Design for Values.

Increment

Value Sensitive Design: Applications, Adaptations, and Critiquesb, appropriations and critiques of VSD, and related scholarly work. We present these heuristics for those who wish to draw upon, refine, and improve values-oriented approaches in their endeavors and may or may not choose to follow the tenets of value sensitive design.

卡死偷電

Conflicting Values in Design for Valuess theorem by assuming a form of value commensurability, although they may be too informationally demanding and have other disadvantages as well. The other three are non-optimizing methods that do not result in one best solution and therefore do not entirely solve the value conflict, although they ar