Titlebook: Handbook of Epistemology; Ilkka Niiniluoto,Matti Sintonen,Jan Woleński Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004 epistemolo

弄碎

書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology被引頻次




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology年度引用




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology讀者反饋




書目名稱Handbook of Epistemology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Abbreviate

率直

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14274-4g. But in analytic philosophy the expression is used as a label for the process by which knowledge or belief is gained from understanding and believing the spoken or written reports of others generally, regardless of setting. In a modern society testimony thus broadly understood is one of the main s

防止

拾落穗

Fresco

擁護(hù)

啟發(fā)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16470-6de what the person thinks is important about a topic or ought to happen regarding it. Nor are they typically discussing what psychologists call ‘concept acquisition’ in the sense of a person’s coming to be able to make judgments about a given topic. Instead, philosophers are quite often relating to

諷刺滑稽戲劇

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-99020-4rers of truth and falsehood? Philosophical discussions of truth tend to revolve around four broad categories of .: sentences (utterances), statements (assertions), beliefs (judgments, thoughts), and propositions. The significant differences among these four categories are responsible for a considera

Kindle

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41215-2 the writings of Michael Dummett... one would expect an antirealist critique of realism to comprise two parts: a negative part (as the name indicates) criticising the realist view, and a positive part setting out a constructive alternative to the realist position. The tradition starting with Dummett