Titlebook: Handbook for the Historiography of Science; Mauro L. Condé,Marlon Salomon Reference work 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Historio

油氈

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3entific knowledge and of all historical narrative. Shapin’s historiographical perspective is an attempt to displace the boundaries of scientific practice established by traditional historiography. These displacements entail a commitment to the central theses of meaning finitism, postulated by the St

喪失

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01576-4on science. Although Hacking is an analytical philosopher, his work has a truly historical character as a result of his support in Michel Foucault’s history of the present and his proposal of a style of scientific reasoning based on Alistair Crombie’s notion of style of scientific thinking. Starting

plasma

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01900-7e French tradition of historical epistemology (namely, Bachelard, Canguilhem, and Foucault) and with the field of science studies, intending to integrate the history of science into history .. Studying the series of collective books organized in the recent decades by the American historian and her i

Obsequious

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501950is the best unit of analysis in the historiography of scientific revolutions. Nor is there a consensus on what best explains the nature of scientific revolutions. This chapter provides a critical examination of the historiography of scientific revolutions. It begins with a brief introduction to the

延期

The Social Evolution of Indonesia analyzed the evolution of philosophy of science and its connection with history of science 30?years after the publication of .. Kuhn’s verdict ought to be understood as the explicit exposition of his viewpoint on a problem raised by his masterpiece, the legitimization of relativism, seen as the cen

Entreaty

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73464-9ms to be a philosophy of “the particular sciences” and not of “science in general.” It is also characterized by its historical character. But history is taken here in the very particular sense of a “critical” history and expands into a broader “history of rationalities.” A historical approach to thi