找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: ;

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: ANNOY
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 03:56:30 | 只看該作者
Adopting Ethical Reasoning in Policy Processes,lanced value conflict management. Complex policy processes require that idealistic discourse ethics is relaxed to acknowledge the importance of individual reflections in ethical reasoning; strategic argumentation; and the possibility of having public ethicists guiding ethical reasoning. The chapter
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:17:56 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:10:17 | 只看該作者
Institutionalizing Green Public Ethics,aucratic ethos. The main argument is that institutional change beyond Weberian instrumental rationality is necessary for green ethical practices to be successfully adopted and upgraded in policy processes. It is elaborated how Weberian principles largely persist in the minds of many public officials
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:42:58 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:09:29 | 只看該作者
Gegenstand und Ziel der Untersuchung,ged somehow by public officials. It is argued that Weberian bureaucratic principles and rationalistic methods tend to dominate, which evokes the following critical question: why not ethical reasoning? The purpose is to develop . as a pragmatic normative approach that can guide environmental value co
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 01:14:55 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9114-0pluralism for making sense of practical policy problems and to manage public value conflicts. In developing this approach, three fields of literature are utilized: public administration ethics, public policy ethics, and pragmatic environmental ethics. It is argued that “good values” can be combined
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:49:48 | 只看該作者
Katharina Schulte,Carsten Schr?dericy processes. It is argued that despite decades of reform activities, three fundamental Weberian ideals tend to persist, which limit the possibilities for ethical reasoning in policy processes: instrumental rationality; the politics-administration distinction; and public administration as a formal
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:47:30 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 12:43:38 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:33:12 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57926-4 activism: radical environmental movement activism; green inside activism—officials having contacts with environmental movements and seeking to change public policy from inside; and science activism in terms of scientists being environmental activists as an integral part of their professional role.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 15:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
高尔夫| 华池县| 陵川县| 宜丰县| 祁门县| 含山县| 察雅县| 丰城市| 什邡市| 洛隆县| 色达县| 太白县| 仙游县| 开平市| 嵩明县| 常德市| 曲阜市| 南安市| 永嘉县| 吉安县| 漠河县| 邯郸县| 遵义市| 郧西县| 涟水县| 庆城县| 承德县| 山西省| 河池市| 白山市| 汕头市| 怀来县| 常宁市| 尚志市| 凤台县| 苍山县| 莱芜市| 太湖县| 克拉玛依市| 大石桥市| 宜城市|