找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: ;

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 大腦
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:49:49 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:40:09 | 只看該作者
National Report on Finland,hat the initial focus is on company law and cooperative law-related issues, as well as accounting. After the main analysis, there is a brief overview of other group-specific rules. Here the focus is on tax law, insolvency law and labor law matters. Finally, the research findings are summarized in a
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:25:32 | 只看該作者
National Report on Singapore,w of Singapore’s regulatory regime relating to corporate groups; while this regime arguably lacks a clear awareness of corporate groups as a distinct phenomenon that calls for specific and tailored regulation, it does contain features that may in some circumstances perform the function of corporate
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:08:01 | 只看該作者
National Report on Croatia,ned as being a legally independent company over which another company (.) may, directly or indirectly, exert a .. Legal definition of the . presupposes that the controlling and (either one or more) controlled companies are subject to the . on behalf of the controlling company. . does not have a spec
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:00:23 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40321-8ontained in the more than twenty National Reports presented to the International Congress on Comparative Law held in Fukuoka, Japan, in 2018, which make up this book. The General Report begins by surveying the manner in which the different legislations define and describe groups of companies, then g
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:03:14 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:32:57 | 只看該作者
Elizabeth Anne Kinsella,Allan Pitmanion law..This essay will enquire the current position and perspective developments of groups of companies’ regime within these areas. The consistent reference to scholarship and case law contribution in this framework shows that the efforts of the legislator are not . sufficient in defining and regu
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 12:05:09 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:07:32 | 只看該作者
Rosa A. Scherson,Daniel P Faithment of corporate groups under Japanese corporate law. Japanese law does not see a corporate group as a legal entity to which rights and obligations are attributable, nor does it contain systematic regulations on corporate groups. However, there are a number of corporate law rules that refer to “par
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:33:30 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 02:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
天等县| 固镇县| 铁岭县| 曲靖市| 忻州市| 济阳县| 延吉市| 广水市| 济南市| 唐河县| 将乐县| 德兴市| 新泰市| 保靖县| 星子县| 天台县| 吴旗县| 四会市| 孝感市| 三都| 正宁县| 沅江市| 顺平县| 曲麻莱县| 开封县| 富裕县| 永德县| 金门县| 长葛市| 金昌市| 高邑县| 瑞安市| 威海市| 通城县| 连平县| 隆子县| 任丘市| 肇源县| 公主岭市| 石首市| 五大连池市|