Titlebook: ;

Guffaw

書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics被引頻次




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics年度引用




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics讀者反饋




書目名稱Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics讀者反饋學科排名

disciplined

BLAND

Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics

貨物

Great Power Conduct and Credibility in World Politics978-3-319-71885-9

雪崩

Introduction,d the beginning of the twenty-first centuries. In a wider perspective, . investigates the pervasive conflict emerging from the power-credibility mismatch when aspirations for retaining self-respect in the complex social systems are not sufficiently underpinned by the self’s power faculties. This vol

avenge

Operationalization of Powerces, and reviews a number of traditional and unorthodox approaches to international stratification in terms of hard power. In comparing various methods of assessing and weighing US military power vis-à-vis Russia’s and China’s, the chapter stems from a premise (conceptualized in realist theories of

avenge

背叛者

Power Periodicityon Kondratieff’s theory of long economic cycles, but differs from the latter in that it considers relative rather than absolute parameters of periodic development. Smolnikov examines what he dubs ., the phenomenon of relative power fading of the European great powers—France, Britain, and Russia. He

CANON

Dynamics of Primacyticular the United States and China, and analyzes their long-term projections. He addresses various scenarios of the future pecking order by 2050, in terms of global economic supremacy, and—on the grounds of PPP-based projections of GDP growth—establishes that contrary to the many long-term global e

側(cè)面左右

Re-examining Modern Realist and Constructivist Concepts of World Politicsr behavior. Initially, it considers the theoretical vitality of various realist threads, and points out to their limitations in explicating irregularities in the comportment of the contemporary great powers. Next, it assesses the salience of constructivist approaches in the same venue, and pinpoints