Titlebook: ;

多嘴多舌

Jules Dupuit (1804–1866): Cost-Benefit Analysis and Collective Choicess contribution to the measurement of public utility, placing his research in a broader perspective, and clarifying the relationships between public utility and another important concept for engineers known as “intérêt general.” This distinction is important to understand Dupuit’s position on many subjects related to economics and regional science.

吞吞吐吐

卡死偷電

Introduction,ons on new topics in regional science) and . (in each case a contemporaneous view on the scientific relevance of a great thinker in regional science, rather than an . piece). Both sets of mini-lectures have been amplified into chapters that are being published as two sub-series, together forming a book series entitled ..

opprobrious

Negro Business and Business Educationons on new topics in regional science) and . (in each case a contemporaneous view on the scientific relevance of a great thinker in regional science, rather than an . piece). Both sets of mini-lectures have been amplified into chapters that are being published as two sub-series, together forming a book series entitled ..

CHECK

大溝

Introduction,ly 2016, a highly successful series of Academy sessions has been held at locations throughout the world, focusing on . (general and strategic reflections on new topics in regional science) and . (in each case a contemporaneous view on the scientific relevance of a great thinker in regional science,

粗野

Interdict

Genpachiro Konno (1906–1996), Yasuhiko Oishi (1922–2014), and Hirotada Kohno (1932–): The Three Grea, Yasuhiko Oishi, and Hirotada Kohno to leading the development of regional science in Japan. These Great Minds each served decade-long terms as Presidents of the Japan Section of the Regional Science Association (RSA), followed by terms as Presidents of the RSA, or its successor, the Regional Scien

減至最低

Anticoagulants

Jules Dupuit (1804–1866): Cost-Benefit Analysis and Collective Choicesfor the evaluation of public policies, in particular, in transport. This method is rooted in the debates on the measurement of public utility between the engineers of the . in the nineteenth century and, in particular, within the work of Jules Dupuit. In this chapter, Philippe Poinsot traces Dupuit’