Titlebook: ;

affront

書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory被引頻次




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory年度引用




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory讀者反饋




書目名稱Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

不如樂死去

The Formation of Neo-Gramscians in International Relations and International Political Economy Neithg and reinvigorating approach to International Relations (IR) and International Political Economy (IPE). The staid and stylized positions of realism and neorealism on the one hand, and the eclectic meanderings of an emergent post-positivism on the other hand, offered little to an erstwhile Left or t

壕溝

Gramsci and Neo-Gramscianism: To What Purpose?t in academic research and teaching in the social sciences. Across the broader field of politics and international relations (IR), there has been a steady flow of Gramscian scholarship, with the publication and translation of more of Antonio Gramsci’s own work and the adoption (and contestation) of

patriarch

初次登臺(tái)

On the Limits of Neo-Gramscian International Relationsmsci into International Relations (IR) would seem to be precisely in order to do the opposite. But in turning to Gramsci’s concept of hegemony, neo-Gramscians in IR are looking for a way to counter the sterile structuralism of neorealism’s account of power politics. In mainstream IR usage, hegemony

Obvious

The State in Neoliberal Globalizationis linked to practical concerns to make sense of the political, economic, and social crises that have become the ordinary aspects of contemporary capitalism throughout the world. Hence, the crucial question as to whether states are capable of intervening in, and are complicit in, such crises, or are

Obvious

Production, Class, and Power in the Neoliberal Transitiontorical process is associated with the profound transformation of key features of the contemporary political economy. For example, the transition is associated with the transnationalization of production, the rise of finance, the end of the cold war, the renewal of U.S. imperialism, and other politi

使堅(jiān)硬

Gender in the Theory and Practice of International Political Economyllenge social relations of inequality, who work within a broadly historical materialist tradition, and who are dedicated to the task of reclaiming an explicitly anticapitalist feminism. Nancy Hartsock, for example, has noted that Marxist inspired critiques of class domination “underline the need for

不持續(xù)就爆

Return to the Sourcets of power on a world scale, avoiding the narrow methodological and epistemological constrictions of problem-solving, whether rational choice, neorealism, or constructivism. Inspired by Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) and his nuanced Marxian heritage and Italian intellectual background, neo-Gramscians

BURSA