Titlebook: ;

Calibrate

Michelle Ferrier,Nisha Garud-Patkardequacy of the degree expression understanding methods, because in both types of text grading information plays an extremely important role. Properties of products as well as diagnosed irregularities are very often described in graded terms (cf. (2.1)).

chemical-peel

的染料

,ParseTalk — The System Context,dequacy of the degree expression understanding methods, because in both types of text grading information plays an extremely important role. Properties of products as well as diagnosed irregularities are very often described in graded terms (cf. (2.1)).

motivate

Integration and Conclusion,gration requires heuristic combinations that call for an all-encompassing empirical evaluation of the integrated modules — a enormous task which could not be tackled in this book. After having outlined this new research agenda, I point out some desiderata of general concern to the degree information extraction task, before I finally conclude.

FOLD

Introduction, the text. It maybe exploited for means of fact retrieval/extraction (Grishman & Hirschman, 1978; Jacobs & Rau, 1990), question answering (Scha, 1990; Cercone & McCalla, 1986), summarization (Alterman, 1992; Hutchins, 1987), or even machine translation (Nirenburg et al., 1992; Carbonell & Tomita, 19

myriad

美食家

Substitution

Representation and Inferences,esentational question of which relations on degrees are used to denote degree expressions — an issue which goes beyond the scope of lexical semantics since it calls for an adequate inferencing procedure. In the previous chapter, I used the standard comparison relations on real numbers to represent c

誤傳

Relative Comparisons,degrees is to determine the pair of compared objects and to construct the proper comparison relation between the relevant degrees adjoined to them. Establishing this comparison relation often requires the reconstruction of semantic material that did not appear on the surface of the utterance and, th

hegemony

Absolute Comparisons,sociated with a .. For instance, the semantics of (6.1b) is not denoted by a predicate for ., but by one for ., where C is constrained by the context in which (6.1b) occurs. This becomes immediately evident in example (6.1) where the context of the utterance, .. (6.1a), crucially determines the vali