Titlebook: Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights; Reconciling Law and Stefan Sch?ferling Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

satisficer

書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights被引頻次




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights年度引用




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights讀者反饋




書目名稱Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

卷發(fā)

Susan R. Wilcox,Ani Aydin,Evie G. Marcolinial right against automated decisions to protect human personhood and agency can serve as a starting point for further regulation. It demonstrates the insufficiency of other regulatory tools before showing that in some legal systems, dignitary concerns provide a sound legal basis for such a proposed right.

compose

The Case for a Right Against Automated Decision-Makingal right against automated decisions to protect human personhood and agency can serve as a starting point for further regulation. It demonstrates the insufficiency of other regulatory tools before showing that in some legal systems, dignitary concerns provide a sound legal basis for such a proposed right.

HAVOC

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5340-5This chapter concludes by summarising the findings and calls for not carelessly sacrificing hard-won human rights achievements for efficiency gains, despite all the advantages that technological developments bring with them, recalling that, ultimately, law is meant to serve the good of humankind.

Culmination

Conclusion and OutlookThis chapter concludes by summarising the findings and calls for not carelessly sacrificing hard-won human rights achievements for efficiency gains, despite all the advantages that technological developments bring with them, recalling that, ultimately, law is meant to serve the good of humankind.

enumaerate

enumaerate

針葉樹

Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights978-3-031-48125-3Series ISSN 2352-1902 Series E-ISSN 2352-1910

RAFF

TOM

Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-Making: Terminological Clarificationsal clarity. This chapter traces the development of the technology and decribes the basic processes behind AI. It explains why AI is not a helpful term from a regulatory perspective and suggests placing the problematic act of decision-making at the center of the further analysis.