Titlebook: Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance; Alberto Amaral,Glen A. Jones,Berit Karseth Book 2002 Spring

引起

Between Control, Rituals and Politics: The Governing Board in Higher Education Institutions in Norw new Act on Universities and Colleges, approved in 1995, provided more autonomy to the institutions by delegating decision-making authority on a number of issues to the individual institutions. This new arrangement places a stronger emphasis on leadership within institutions. Second, there was a reo

legislate

非實(shí)體

installment

The Structure of University Governance in Canada: A Policy Network Approach,irnbaum 1988; Hardy 1990; Pusser and Ordorika 2001). While these approaches are frequently discussed as ‘models’ of higher education governance, they are perhaps best understood as different organisational frames or analytical lenses. The bureaucratic frame, for example, applies Weber’s characterist

oxidant

Ethics

Governance in US Universities,panded, universities and colleges repeatedly took steps to serve a more diverse clientele, to deepen their research engagements, and to extend their public service and outreach activities. By the early 1980s, the term ‘multi-university’ came into use in order to describe the multiple roles and wide

disrupt

多樣

匯總

A Guide to Spring Material Selection,the ideological, institutional and organisational reforms associated with the latter have impacted on UK universities. The project was undertaken with particular regard to the selection, roles and practices of manager-academics and their implications for the longer-term position of professional academics.

忘恩負(fù)義的人