Titlebook: Governing Cities in a Global Era; Urban Innovation, Co Robin Hambleton (Professor of City Leadership, and Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a d

Covenant

書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era被引頻次




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era年度引用




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era讀者反饋




書目名稱Governing Cities in a Global Era讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

幸福愉悅感

Governing the Capital—Comparing Institutional Reform in Berlin, London, and Parished their limits and are now in retreat. At the same time it has become quite obvious (especially in London between 1986 and 2000) that all modes of horizontal self-coordination have severe disadvantages—as long as they do not operate in the shadow of hierarchical decision-making procedures as “ulti

影響深遠(yuǎn)

Uneven Development, City Governance, and Urban Change—Unpacking the Global-Local Nexus in Dublin’s If global commodity chains, and emergent consumption trends and lifestyle changes. All of these issues are relevant across different regions worldwide and at different points on the global urban hierarchy (from so-called world cities to “ordinary” cities), and thus remain the subject of important the

multiply

Urban Challenges in Latin American Cities: Medellín and the Limits of Governance ability to maintain social peace and guarantee acceptable levels of law and order. It also implies a basic societal consensus around the premises of (Western) democracy—human rights, the rule of law, and the marketplace. It assumes governability, development, opportunity, accountability, and trust.

后來

persistence

The New Ecology of Urban Governance: Special-Purpose Authorities and Urban Developmentborhood improvement and housing development. Nevertheless, most of the time, special-purpose authorities operate under the radar for most urban scholars and for broader publics. This is certain to change in the years ahead.

persistence

anthesis

William Buchanan BSc, CEng, Phdn the new order, world cities are interdependent, yet they also compete with one another through a hierarchically structured network of cities (Friedmann and Wolff 1982; Friedmann 1986; Knox 1995; Sassen 2001a).

JOG

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86035-7hed their limits and are now in retreat. At the same time it has become quite obvious (especially in London between 1986 and 2000) that all modes of horizontal self-coordination have severe disadvantages—as long as they do not operate in the shadow of hierarchical decision-making procedures as “ulti

毛細(xì)血管

Thermostats and waste disposal,f global commodity chains, and emergent consumption trends and lifestyle changes. All of these issues are relevant across different regions worldwide and at different points on the global urban hierarchy (from so-called world cities to “ordinary” cities), and thus remain the subject of important the