Titlebook: Governance of Arctic Shipping; Rethinking Risk, Hum Aldo Chircop,Floris Goerlandt,Ronald Pelot Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicab

Mammal

Alfred Ku?,Michael Kleinaltenkamph regard to the operations of vessels in their waters through partnerships and other forms of collaboration. To understand and address these concerns, there is a need to understand and appreciate the worldview within which they are based. To support cross-cultural dialogue on shipping matters, this

white-matter

,Grundzüge des K?uferverhaltens,nsive data hubs and spatial data infrastructures. These data hubs are often composed of different types of datasets, from oceanographic to biological and socioeconomic. In the Canadian Arctic, and in the context of co-governance arrangements and participatory approaches, these data hubs include, pro

Aviary

,Grundzüge des K?uferverhaltens, cruise ships are beneficiaries of Arctic cruise tourism. They provide leisure, tourism, travel, and hospitality services to the increasing number of international cruisers who are motivated to experience the “l(fā)ast frontier” tourism, including the changing and disappearing Arctic landscape and wildl

Glucose

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91993-9ngerous occupations in the world. Technological development and climate change, as well as the increasing level of Arctic shipping opening driven by oceanographic changes together with technological innovation, lead to significant health and safety challenges for mariners in Canada. Drawing on findi

挖掘

Entwicklung von Marketingstrategien,es in the world, even more hazardous than shipping. Both sectors are vulnerable to the effects of weather and require travelling significant distances into and through a range of environments and changing marine contexts, while workers complete complex tasks on moving platforms. Fishing relies on ma

mediocrity

結(jié)束

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85898-6tion has gradually expanded the scope of ship emission regulation to include VOCs, SOx, NOx, particulate matter and, more recently, greenhouse gas emissions. This regulatory effort has not been integrated and displays some inconsistency and even fragmentation, resulting in different levels of enviro

遺棄

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6622-3ers came into effect in 2011, the international community has been engaged in a discourse on whether to adopt a similar standard for ships operating in Arctic waters. The issues are complex as, in addition to reducing the environmental risks posed by HFOs, there are economic and social consequences,

Euphonious

大溝

,Schlu?betrachtung und Ausblick,herent decision-making. France has to respect the European commitments imposed by the IMP and especially the Marine Strategy and the Maritime Spatial Planning Directives. On this basis, France has adopted a National Sea and Coast Strategy. The Strategy defines four maritime fa?ades. For each fa?ade,