找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Google and the Law; Empirical Approaches Aurelio Lopez-Tarruella Book 2012 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 16113|回復(fù): 54
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:49:03 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Google and the Law
副標(biāo)題Empirical Approaches
編輯Aurelio Lopez-Tarruella
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/388/387400/387400.mp4
概述Topical issue as Google is used by millions of people every day.Analyzes whether accusations against Google are well-founded.Explores if existing legal systems are adapted to Google business model or
叢書名稱Information Technology and Law Series
圖書封面Titlebook: Google and the Law; Empirical Approaches Aurelio Lopez-Tarruella Book 2012 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s
描述Google’s has proved to be one of the most successful business models in today’s knowledge economy. Its services and applications have become part of our day-to-day life. However, Google has repeatedly been accused of acting outside the law in the development of services such as Adwords, Googlebooks or YouTube. One of the main purposes of this book is to assess whether those accusations are well-founded. But more important than that, this book provides a deeper reflection: are current legal systems adapted to business models such as that of Google or are they conceived for an industrial economy? Do the various lawsuits involving Google show an evolution of the existing legal framework that might favour the flourishing of other knowledge-economy businesses? Or do they simply reflect that Google has gone too far? What lessons can other knowledge-based businesses learn from all the disputes in which Google has been or is involved?This book is valuable reading for legal practitioners and academics in the field of information technologies and intellectual property law, economists interested in knowledge-economy business models and sociologists interested in internet and social networks.D
出版日期Book 2012
關(guān)鍵詞Google; Information and Communication Technologies; Intellectual Property; Internet; Law
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-846-0
isbn_softcover978-90-6704-995-5
isbn_ebook978-90-6704-846-0Series ISSN 1570-2782 Series E-ISSN 2215-1966
issn_series 1570-2782
copyrightT.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s) 2012
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Google and the Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Google and the Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Google and the Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Google and the Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Google and the Law被引頻次




書目名稱Google and the Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Google and the Law年度引用




書目名稱Google and the Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Google and the Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Google and the Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:59:28 | 只看該作者
978-90-6704-995-5T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s) 2012
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:52:09 | 只看該作者
Google and the Law978-90-6704-846-0Series ISSN 1570-2782 Series E-ISSN 2215-1966
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:17:38 | 只看該作者
Major Companies of Europe 1992/93 harm consumers and competitors. This chapter examines whether Google should be held dominant under the European regulatory framework for abuse of dominance, and if so, whether the practices it has been accused of constitute an abuse of such dominance.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:34:01 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:36:54 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:17:09 | 只看該作者
Introduction: Google Pushing the Boundaries of Law, a new web search engine that was far quicker than the ones we used to work with at that time. The first impression I got was not very good: the home page was all in white and not very attractive. But my friend insisted on how fast it was and he constantly made me check the upper side of the results
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:39:03 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:44:01 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:39:13 | 只看該作者
Google and Personal Data Protection, and Google Street View. The chapter assesses first the applicability of the Data Protection Directive, then jurisdictional issues, the principles relating to data quality, whether there is a legitimate purpose for data processing, and lastly the transparency principle in connection with the rights
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 22:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
楚雄市| 三亚市| 凤翔县| 南城县| 土默特右旗| 乐昌市| 巴马| 八宿县| 屏东市| 西昌市| 望谟县| 万宁市| 庆元县| 江达县| 英超| 兴义市| 伊金霍洛旗| 海晏县| 会昌县| 卓尼县| 万载县| 黔江区| 灵丘县| 乐山市| 交城县| 青神县| 凤山县| 沙河市| 南安市| 德化县| 浦东新区| 洛阳市| 阳信县| 开平市| 清流县| 唐山市| 阳高县| 马龙县| 天等县| 梨树县| 五原县|