Titlebook: Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal; Frederick Amrine,Francis J. Zucker,Harvey Wheeler Book 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrech

RACE

0068-0346 the divine within him and the divine of the universe were most intimately united. So, for Goethe, the resonance with a natural rationality seems part of the genius of modern science. Einstein‘s ‘cosmic religion‘, which reflects Spinoza, also echoes Goethe‘s remark (Ibid. , Item 575 from 1829): Man m

變形

Liquidit?t am deutschen Kapitalmarkts a certain resemblance to this penance of the children of Danaus: the vessel provided by the second language is often frustratingly inadequate in conveying the meanings found in the original, and this frustration may yield to a sense of despair when the fundamental impossibility of the task is realized.

lactic

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554566e’s involvement with science which are still valuable. Far from being surpassed by more recent appreciations of Goethe by scientists, historians of science and Goethe scholars, Helmholtz’s full interpretation has scarcely been assimilated. It could still prove to be important for the current interest in Goethe’s scientific concerns.

Charade

叢林

Lise Meitner and the Dawn of the Nuclear Age statement about the plant: he was trying to teach us how to . it. Thus I propose an . in which we practice a little Goethean morphology together, and I hope that this . performed by a non-botanist will prove, if not instructive, at least entertaining.

Guileless

Goethe and Helmholtz: Science and Sensatione’s involvement with science which are still valuable. Far from being surpassed by more recent appreciations of Goethe by scientists, historians of science and Goethe scholars, Helmholtz’s full interpretation has scarcely been assimilated. It could still prove to be important for the current interest in Goethe’s scientific concerns.

Pantry

The Theory of Color as the Symbolism of Insights a symbol of science (in Goethe’s sense) as such. By examining nearly all of Goethe’s other scientific activities, we sought to see how they were interrelated, and also the form his procedure takes in each case. We now return to a more general consideration which, among other things, also summarizes and builds upon this earlier material.

侵蝕

Goethean Method in the Work of Jochen Bockemühl statement about the plant: he was trying to teach us how to . it. Thus I propose an . in which we practice a little Goethean morphology together, and I hope that this . performed by a non-botanist will prove, if not instructive, at least entertaining.

不理會(huì)

interrupt

Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal978-94-009-3761-1Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942