找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: God and Mental Causation; Daniel Lim Book 2015 The Author(s) 2015 Argument from Consciousness.Causal Closure.Causal Exclusion.Compatibilis

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 17596|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:03:26 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation
編輯Daniel Lim
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/388/387201/387201.mp4
概述Includes supplementary material:
叢書(shū)名稱SpringerBriefs in Philosophy
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: God and Mental Causation;  Daniel Lim Book 2015 The Author(s) 2015 Argument from Consciousness.Causal Closure.Causal Exclusion.Compatibilis
描述This book lies at the intersection of philosophy of mind and philosophy of religion and operates on the assumption that dialogue between the two disciplines can be fruitful. ?In particular it focuses on how debates in the philosophy of mind regarding the nature of mental causation relate to debates in the philosophy of religion regarding divine action, creaturely causation, and existence of God..The book is divided into two parts. ?The first deals with Jaegwon Kim’s so-called Supervenience Argument (SA) against non-reductive physicalism. ?One important observation is that the structural similarities between non-reductive physicalism and ‘orthodox’ theism make it convenient to co-opt non-reductive physicalist solutions to the SA in defending the possibility of creaturely causation in the philosophy of religion. ?The SA is used as a foil to discuss the relative merits of Malebranche’s so-called Conservation is Continuous Creation Argument for Occasionalism (CCCA). ?Moverover, the so-called compatibilist strategy (Karen Bennett 2003, 2009) for developing a non-reductive physicalist response to the Supervenience Argument is defended and developed. ?This strategy is then deployed in the
出版日期Book 2015
關(guān)鍵詞Argument from Consciousness; Causal Closure; Causal Exclusion; Compatibilism; Mental Causation; Occasiona
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6
isbn_softcover978-3-662-47425-9
isbn_ebook978-3-662-47426-6Series ISSN 2211-4548 Series E-ISSN 2211-4556
issn_series 2211-4548
copyrightThe Author(s) 2015
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation年度引用




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱God and Mental Causation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:19:24 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:45:34 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:07:30 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:42:27 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15345-7ions to the Supervenience Argument can be adapted to offer Orthodox Theistic solutions to the Conservation is Continuous Creation Argument. One particular Non-reductive Physicalist solution will be examined in detail and then applied in the debate over Occasionalism.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:21:28 | 只看該作者
Future Life Time Oriented Design Concepts,d is examined. One of its key premises, the contingency of the mind–body relation, is at odds with the possibility of mental causation. The AC may be rescued from this problem by adapting some of the lessons learned in Chap.?. concerning one of the Non-reductive Physicalist solutions to the Supervenience Argument.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:55:00 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:15:47 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:58:06 | 只看該作者
God,d is examined. One of its key premises, the contingency of the mind–body relation, is at odds with the possibility of mental causation. The AC may be rescued from this problem by adapting some of the lessons learned in Chap.?. concerning one of the Non-reductive Physicalist solutions to the Supervenience Argument.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:35:19 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 08:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
东莞市| 新乡县| 陆河县| 含山县| 古浪县| 轮台县| 五大连池市| 庆城县| 镇远县| 邮箱| 武威市| 辽中县| 凤庆县| 沭阳县| 贡嘎县| 舒城县| 当涂县| 巨野县| 鄂托克前旗| 西和县| 闽侯县| 开江县| 石景山区| 宁河县| 通化市| 平泉县| 苏州市| 祁门县| 泰来县| 达拉特旗| 富锦市| 土默特左旗| 阿合奇县| 海阳市| 舟曲县| 来宾市| 安徽省| 荃湾区| 望城县| 青田县| 双牌县|