Titlebook: Globalization and Economic Ethics; Distributive Justice Albino Barrera Book 2007 Albino Barrera 2007 creativity.economic ethics.economy.eff

hidebound

蒼白

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609761creativity; economic ethics; economy; efficiency; electronics; ethics; globalization; information; microelec

GUMP

Overlapping Questions: Globalization and Distributive Justicems and counterclaims of both sides of the debate is a highly contentious task. The two dominant questions of contemporary economic ethics are: (1) should globalization be reined in or even halted and then reversed altogether, and (2) what criterion ought we use for distributive justice? This chapter

cyanosis

OATH

船員

阻礙

Need Satisfaction as a Necessary Condition of Efficiency many to be the most important, namely: need, efficiency, and entitlement. Unfortunately, his positive theory of distributive justice does not go so far as to provide a rank ordering of these three norms. Most survey respondents concluded that the relative importance of these standards depended on c

Abrupt

coalition

Ownership Externalities and the Market as a Public Good53) who argues that justice in both the acquisition and transfer of properties entitles their proprietors to receive whatever is their due from ownership of such holdings. Societal output ought to be divided according to what people bring to the marketplace and what they contribute.

LAVE

Summary and Conclusions: Distributive Justice in the Knowledge Economyt is the appropriate criterion to use for distributive justice? Is it efficiency, need, contribution, entitlement, equality, effort, or ability? Globalization has only compounded the complexity of these unresolved questions. Discourse on globalization and distributive justice can be particularly fru