Titlebook: Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use; Natural Resource Man E. Carina H. Keskitalo Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applic

烈酒

書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use被引頻次




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use年度引用




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use讀者反饋




書目名稱Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

BIPED

在前面

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14056-5st be comprehended through complex conceptions, of not only rural but also urban populations and the intersections existing between them. The cases highlighted in this book thus in particular show upon the large but also changing role of forest ownership in Europe.

星星

Individual Forest Owners in Context,s volume are scrutinised and interpreted here on a micro level. Urbanisation, economic restructuring, demographic change and new ownership constellations are both drivers and consequences of changes in lifestyles, forest owner identity, place attachment and attitudes to the forest resource.

一起平行

動脈

Keine Probleme mit Inversen Problemen say something about the role of forest in relation to broader rural development. However, this also makes it crucial to contextualise this case in comparison with other examples throughout Europe, to illustrate the great variation in what forest ownership, forest use and the new forest owner may mean in different cases.

動脈

–DOX

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05482-1ng current understandings of the rural: drawing upon an example from the Swedish case, it amongst others shows that a redistributive tax system has played a larger and more crucial role than rural policy in retaining active rural areas in Sweden.

lanugo

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-56898-642-4ts, and they contributed to the mobilisation of different types of capital. In each case there is evidence of interaction with higher governance levels, which protects the group’s room for action. The provision of access to natural and physical resources for rural people in a broader sense illustrates the cases’ orientation towards public good.

Crayon

Introduction, say something about the role of forest in relation to broader rural development. However, this also makes it crucial to contextualise this case in comparison with other examples throughout Europe, to illustrate the great variation in what forest ownership, forest use and the new forest owner may mean in different cases.