Titlebook: Global Responses to Domestic Violence; Eve S. Buzawa,Carl G. Buzawa Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Alternative Justic

字形刻痕

FLAT

集中營(yíng)

Australian Perspectives on Domestic Violence, private matter largely prevailed until the 1970s, when feminist activism and governmental inquiries emphasised that it is a social problem mostly affecting women. Contemporary policy responses in Australia draw on a gendered analysis of domestic violence although some groups challenge that approach

Dealing

Family Violence and the Legal and Social Responses in China,disadvantaged family members has not been a common concern. Research on family violence, such as its prevalence and related consequences, is also a relatively new field. As a result, the seriousness of family violence has not yet been fully considered. China’s very first . was passed in 2015 and it

創(chuàng)新

放逐

Responding to Domestic Violence in Korea,o violence perpetrated by male partners, is deeply rooted in the cultural ideology shaped by the residual influences of Confucianism and Communalism. Although a significant improvement has been observed since the implementation of two special acts on domestic violence in 1998 and accompanying effort

隼鷹

行乞

態(tài)學(xué)

Domestic Violence in the Arab World,historical roots of domestic violence represented in traditional patterns of behavior, and their creation of a patriarchal system. From a historical perspective, this was based on giving preference to males over females, as well as marginalizing and persecuting women. The chapter also highlights the

allergy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04861-1rs have seen scholars throughout the world beginning to address this problem, but much of this information is difficult to access..This chapter begins with a discussion of transnational initiatives to respond to domestic violence. The World Health Organization (WHO) has provided considerable insight