Titlebook: Global Media and Communication Policy; An International Per Petros Iosifidis Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishe

傳家寶

書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy被引頻次




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy年度引用




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy讀者反饋




書目名稱Global Media and Communication Policy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

caldron

Media Policy in the Public Interest performance of media systems and designing policies that might enhance such performance (McQuail, 1992a). These criteria may vary across different national contexts, but there are some core principles that underpin effective media policies. Serving the public interest is a normative principle that

寬大

我不明白

Media Policy and Regulation in the Public Interest: Looking Aheadons policies are generally guided by and legitimized in the name of the ‘public interest’. The literature review attempted to outline the terms in which the field is defined, but it was far from comprehensive in terms of geographical reach, for it was limited to English-language publications with ex

煤渣

Global Communication Paradigmsof how thinkers have approached the issue. This chapter provides a brief historical account of global communication and an assessment of the various paradigms that have dominated the field in the past half-century or so: modernization theory; cultural or media imperialism; critical political economy

Intruder

Intruder

公豬

Media and Communications Policy in the European Unionlatory regime to oversee communication issues in its territory. While the print media in Europe have traditionally enjoyed a great degree of autonomy and self-regulation (Hutchison, 2007), broadcasting has attracted state intervention because of technical matters (spectrum limitation1) but also beca

溝通

Tonometry

Regulatory Convergence from the convergence phenomenon. Expanding on the concluding remarks of the previous chapter, the chapter reviews the discrepancies between policies employed in different communications sectors and challenges resulting from convergence in policymaking and assesses the reforms adopted in reaction to