找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Giving Reasons; A Linguistic-Pragmat Lilian Bermejo Luque Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Argumentation.Argumentation T

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 48657|回復(fù): 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:07:37 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons
副標(biāo)題A Linguistic-Pragmat
編輯Lilian Bermejo Luque
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/386/385803/385803.mp4
概述Provides Argumentation Theory with a new, linguistic approach.Integrates argumentation’s logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions.Solves challenging meta-theoretical questions, e.g. the justific
叢書(shū)名稱Argumentation Library
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Giving Reasons; A Linguistic-Pragmat Lilian Bermejo Luque Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Argumentation.Argumentation T
描述This book provides a new, linguistic approach to Argumentation Theory. Its main goal is to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powers. This model takes as its basis Speech Acts Theory in order to characterize argumentation as a second-order speech act complex. The result is a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretation, analysis and evaluation of arguments. This theory sheds light on the many faces of argumentative communication: verbal and non-verbal, monological and dialogical, literal and non-literal, ordinary and specialized..The book takes into consideration the major current comprehensive accounts of good argumentation (Perelman’s New Rhetoric, Pragma-dialectics, the ARG model, the Epistemic Approach) and shows that these accounts have fundamental weaknesses rooted in their instrumentalist conception of argumentation as an activity oriented to a goal external to itself. Furthermore, the author addresses some challenging meta-theoretical questions such as the justification problem for Argumentation Theory models and the relationship between reaso
出版日期Book 2011
關(guān)鍵詞Argumentation; Argumentation Theory; Argumentative Value; Burden of Proof; Cognitivism; Deductivism; Deep
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9
isbn_softcover978-94-007-3784-6
isbn_ebook978-94-007-1761-9Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
issn_series 1566-7650
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Giving Reasons讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:52:42 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:03:20 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:52:52 | 只看該作者
The Logical Dimension of Argumentation,ons, it follows that, if argumentation is a complex of logical, dialectical and rhetorical properties, as contended in Chapter 3, then good argumentation will be argumentation satisfying logical, dialectical and rhetorical conditions..Yet, the other side of this coin is that argumentative normativit
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:20:24 | 只看該作者
The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation,have to fulfill two tasks: on the one hand, showing that any type of argumentation, whether dialogical or monological, involves such a dialectical dimension; but on the other hand, showing that dialectical normativity cannot be reduced to argumentative normativity ...In this chapter, I deal with the
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:03:15 | 只看該作者
The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation,ncept of argumentative value..In order to show the specifics of this proposal, I outline current strategies for dealing with the rhetorical within Argumentation Theory. This task is partly carried out by following the criticisms that C. Kock has raised against the three main theories of argumentatio
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:59:10 | 只看該作者
Argumentation Appraisal,heory. Consequently, I deal with the logical, dialectical and rhetorical conditions that determine whether an act of arguing succeeds at its constitutive goal of showing a target claim to be correct..As pointed out in Chapter 1, in our account, the analysis of argumentation is to be displayed on two
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:28:51 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54532-3cifics of linguistic communication. In addition, it is meant to show in which ways the activity of arguing is particularly akin to humans as rational and social beings: on the one hand, it is a tool to make our beliefs and claims rational, that is, a justificatory device; on the other, it is a means
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:09:23 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:24:55 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 05:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
翁牛特旗| 平乐县| 巧家县| 平武县| 中阳县| 盐山县| 阿克苏市| 临湘市| 遂宁市| 浠水县| 万安县| 饶平县| 肥西县| 泗阳县| 德州市| 柳林县| 阳西县| 龙南县| 建昌县| 岳普湖县| 顺昌县| 大石桥市| 天门市| 邢台市| 从化市| 山西省| 云梦县| 逊克县| 繁昌县| 宜城市| 中西区| 禄劝| 诏安县| 肥城市| 赤水市| 仪征市| 资源县| 上杭县| 赤峰市| 同德县| 桓仁|