Titlebook: George Orwell; After "1984" Alan Sandison Book 1986 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1986 aesthetics.ethics.G

Spring

書目名稱George Orwell影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱George Orwell影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Orwell網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱George Orwell網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Orwell被引頻次




書目名稱George Orwell被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Orwell年度引用




書目名稱George Orwell年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Orwell讀者反饋




書目名稱George Orwell讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

dominant

Operating inside Nature,he free personality. But what does nature really mean to him? It means, of course, the nature of rocks and stones and trees to which he would seem at first glance to have an almost sentimental attachment:

來就得意

irradicable

過份艷麗

Operating in History: Ethics and Aesthetics,we know it is inseparable from the sanctity of the individual’.. His whole position — aesthetic, ethical and moral — is subsumed in this flat assertion, though there are many other places where he is equally explicit about the impossibility of any divorce between art and morality. As he sees it, bot

充氣球

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus,ven if it does not take on a religious colouring’.. Lionel Trilling has claimed, too, that ‘a(chǎn)lthough Orwell admired some of the effects and attitudes of religion, he seems to have had no religious tendency in his nature, or none that went beyond what used to be called natural piety.’. But Orwell’s m

充氣球

Postscript: 1984, novel may then have a better chance of being seen in proper perspective. It will be so much more easily apparent that the work’s meaning far transcends the sum of these quite humble parts, and that it forms an organic whole with all that has gone before in the writer’s artistic corpus.

植物茂盛

2947-2520 herein the Protestant urge to question struggles with a longing to assent. The argument of the book was described in the Economist as ‘brilliantly sustained and magisterially cumulative‘. Ten years after first publication this new edition of the book, which significantly extends the argument, is sti

GENRE

EVICT