Titlebook: George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries; Essays in Victorian Gordon S. Haight,Hugh Witemeyer Book 1992 Mary N. Haight 1992 Charles Dic

Malevolent

書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries被引頻次




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries年度引用




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries年度引用學科排名




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries讀者反饋




書目名稱George Eliot’s Originals and Contemporaries讀者反饋學科排名

一大塊

疾馳

詞匯表

The Heroine of the standard reference works today and has held the title from the beginning. Henry James, reviewing the book in 1873, regretted that she was forced to share the story with Rosamond Vincy and Mary Garth. ‘Dorothea was altogether too superb a heroine to be wasted; yet she plays a narrower part than

DEI

George Eliot’s Klesmerr, he performs several important functions in the novel. Like Daniel he acts as mentor to both Gwendolen and Mirah, his opinions of their singing placing them in a strong contrast maintained throughout the story. His brutal dismissal of Gwendolen’s dream of earning her living as a singer or actress

Ergots

Ergots

GULLY

figure

Dickens and Lewes on Spontaneous Combustionfor the scene from Krook’s first appearance with his fierce cat Lady Jane in the rag and bottle warehouse by the wall of Lincoln’s Inn. ‘He was short, cadaverous, and withered; with his head sunk sideways between his shoulders, and the breath issuing in visible smoke from his mouth, as if he were on

diathermy

George Meredith and the eticence. Though he must have earned a living somehow, his . (1851), . (1856) and . (1857) could hardly have supported him. Late in life, when John Lane asked whether he had been ‘responsible for any anonymous or pseudonymous volume or contributions to periodical literature’, Meredith replied: ‘Noth