Titlebook: George Eliot and Victorian Historiography; Imagining the Nation Neil McCaw Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

Reagan

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)George Eliot and Victorian Historiography讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Intellectual

heirloom

Emotional Logic and Decision Makingween history and national identity. The past is identified as foreign Other in relation to the metaphorical and dominant nation of the historical present. This notion of the past as foreign Other identifies the ability to write history, to narrate the group experience, as ideologically crucial. For,

MONY

秘方藥

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43149-5gland as a historical nation. Crucially, this evolution will be seen to be informed by a pervasive English nationalism derived from a dominant trend of British historiography, namely the so-called Whig Interpretation of History. In the first of these chapters the qualified presence of Whiggish perce

arsenal

arsenal

Emily Margaret Murray,Margherita Paola Poto George Eliot’s fiction is disturbed by a contradictory, disputatious voice. This voice problematizes the smoothness of the narrative, particularly in its rejection of Whiggish optimism and self-congratulatory present-centredness. The fissures in the realization of the Whig Interpretation arise out

緩和

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263759ness embodied in her work. And, although the ‘symbolic realism’. of Carlyle (as Chris Brooks has called it) and George Eliot’s particular historical imagining differ as far as their philosophical-religious foundation is concerned, they also overlap in the way that historical process is realized. The

出血

Accomplish