Titlebook: George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency; David Mervin Book 1998 David Mervin 1998 budget.foreign policy.Policy

Covenant

書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency被引頻次




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency年度引用




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency讀者反饋




書目名稱George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

清洗

成績(jī)上升

CHAR

Organizing the Presidency,ogy such as ‘the age of Roosevelt’, ‘the Johnson years’ and ‘the Reagan era’, but these are simplistic labels concealing the truth that every modern president is utterly dependent on a large White House staff. A suitably skilled and effective staff is essential if a president is to stand any chance

阻撓

謙卑

,‘Preventing Bad Laws’,hem to advance proposals for change and to mastermind their enactment into law. As a new president takes up office the problems of governance are reduced to activist clichés. He is advised to ‘hit the ground running’ and is expected to exploit fully the opportunities offered by the ‘honeymoon’ relat

謙卑

The 1990 Budget Crisis,ystem. The difficulties encountered exposed the extraordinary fragility of party discipline in the national legislature, emphasized the problems of divided government and once again cast doubt on the very governability of the United States. For the purposes of this study, however, the budget crisis

嚴(yán)峻考驗(yàn)

Guardianship and Foreign Policy,f the power of government. In dealing with foreign and national security issues, by contrast, they adopt a more activist stance, as Richard Rose has noted: ‘A guardian President wants to be more influential abroad than at home.’. This was certainly true in the case of George Bush, yet for all that t

譏諷

The War in the Gulf,adership débacle whereas the latter showed President Bush in a far more favourable light, particularly if the analysis is concentrated primarily, as it will be here, on the seven months between Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait at the beginning of August 1990 and the cease fire agreed at the end of Febuary

Mundane

Conclusions, opponents, media pundits or academics. As a guardian president Bush expressed boundless faith in the American political and economic system.. Furthermore, in contrast to reforming presidents of the past like Wilson, the two Roosevelts and Johnson, he regarded extensions of the role of government wi