Titlebook: Generalized Quantifiers; Linguistic and Logic Peter G?rdenfors Book 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987 Index.grammar.noun phrase.quanti

Omniscient

歌唱隊

convert

There-Sentences and Generalized Quantifiers,answer to why it is definite noun phrases that typically are discourse anaphors, and not the indefinites. To do that we will employ a constraint on sentence interpretation which was used implicitly in B & C in their treatment of ETSs. It is defined as follows.

DEAWL

Noun Phrase Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics,trated in (1a), where ?. binds the occurrences of . in its restrictor .(.) and its scope .(.), but not the occurrence of . in .. Similarly, in (1b) the universal quantifier binds the first two but not the third occurrence of . as a term..

Onerous

0924-4662 n here and the authors have commented on each other‘s contributions in order to integrate the collection. The organizers of the workshop gratefully acknowledge 978-1-55608-018-0978-94-009-3381-1Series ISSN 0924-4662 Series E-ISSN 2215-034X

incisive

Book 1987h‘s contribution has been added because of its close relationship with the rest of the papers. The articles have been revised for publication here and the authors have commented on each other‘s contributions in order to integrate the collection. The organizers of the workshop gratefully acknowledge

責怪

A保存的

神圣不可

Multilingual Publics: Fansubbing Global TVI would like to start with reviewing some of the basic intuitions behind the system LPM, the logic of plurals and mass terms, as it is described in Link (1983). Since I shall be concerned with plurals only in this paper I’ll skip the mass term part of the system. The remaining logic might be called LP.

最初