Titlebook: Gender, Masculinity and Video Gaming; Analysing Reddit‘s r Marcus Maloney,Steven Roberts,Timothy Graham Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applica

Obstruction

行為

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5687-9s that emerged from the feminine gendered sample comments set, along with the numbers/percentages of comments included in each. In the four sections that follow, we outline and dig deeper into our four key discursive subcategories: ‘marginalising’, ‘inclusive’, ‘reactionary’ and ‘open’. We then conc

DEAF

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67510-2on. Clearly, evidence for the continuance of marginalising discourses is unmistakable. However, we must also be careful not to ignore or understate the dynamic contestations that are occurring in this space—or, for that matter, the emerging prominence of overtly inclusive voices. This is not a set o

insipid

aesthetic

Hegemonic, Inclusive and Geek Masculinities,s on an understanding of the subreddit as a ‘masculinised space’. While Reddit’s own data suggests that users are predominately male, r/gaming is not approached here per se as an online community comprised mostly of boys and men. Rather, we seek to make sense of r/gaming as an online forum in which

ASSAY

Computational Survey,or making sense of a year’s worth of gendered comments in this space. In the first section, we explore the voting tendencies of users when commentary is masculine versus femininity gendered; and then measure the emotional valence or ‘sentiment score’ elicited by each gendered dataset. In the second

否認(rèn)

Masculine Discourses in r/gaming,tions in which we discuss the two overarching categories that emerged during the coding process. This is then followed by a broader summary and some tentative concluding thoughts. Power dynamics emerge as a central part of masculine gendered discourse on r/gaming, but they offer only one part of a b

Licentious

Feminine Discourses in r/gaming,s that emerged from the feminine gendered sample comments set, along with the numbers/percentages of comments included in each. In the four sections that follow, we outline and dig deeper into our four key discursive subcategories: ‘marginalising’, ‘inclusive’, ‘reactionary’ and ‘open’. We then conc

手工藝品

Conclusion,on. Clearly, evidence for the continuance of marginalising discourses is unmistakable. However, we must also be careful not to ignore or understate the dynamic contestations that are occurring in this space—or, for that matter, the emerging prominence of overtly inclusive voices. This is not a set o

合乎習(xí)俗