Titlebook: Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea; Nicola Anne Jones Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Na

確定

Ephraim Nissan,Yohanan Petrovsky-ShternThis concluding chapter addresses three central questions:

garrulous

conquer

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-8461-6democratization; feminism; gender; gender mainstreaming; gender studies; Institution; methods; modeling; pol

平項(xiàng)山

喃喃訴苦

Biguanides

拱墻

Thomas Uppenbrink,Sebastian Frankat facilitate or constrain the realization of these demands are shaped by the balance of power among a broader array of state and civil society actors. To understand the contestation of gender politics we therefore need to examine the specific gendered interests of the state, progressive civil socie

superfluous

Bert Brechts Weimarer Geschichten, analysts of the gender dynamics of democracy have tended to focus on problems of “institutional inertia” (Craske, 1999), “the return to politics as usual” (Jaquette and Wolchik, 1998), or even “masculinist politics” (Moon, 2003). Although such approaches make a valuable contribution to the democra

誘騙

PAC

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45054-0,” and those who view the state “as the primary terrain in the struggles for the advancement of women” (Craske, 1999: 84). Whereas some studies emphasize the resources the state can offer women (e.g., women’s refuges, health clinics, childcare facilities) (e.g., O’Connor et al., 1999), others focus