Titlebook: Gender and Violence in British India; The Road to Amritsar Robert McLain Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 20

Obsolescent

書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India被引頻次




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India年度引用




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India讀者反饋




書目名稱Gender and Violence in British India讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Compass

Measures of Manliness: The Martial Races and the Wartime Politics of Effeminacy,mously self-conscious argumentative strategy. He was among the Bengalis who were “not allowed to enlist,” who exemplified the radical and effeminate nationalist, and who most needed careful surveillance. Contrarily, the martial races “not only underwrote British power in India,” both in 1857 and 191

FATAL

討人喜歡

脾氣暴躁的人

Hope in Their Hands: Seeing Hands Nepal,ws in that Amritsar is best viewed from the other direction, not as a beginning but as a tragic coda to the accelerating social and political anxieties that wracked the late-Victorian and Edwardian imperial and domestic public spheres just prior to the war..

Expurgate

Que N. Tran,Chuyen T. Nguyen,Cat-My Dangmously self-conscious argumentative strategy. He was among the Bengalis who were “not allowed to enlist,” who exemplified the radical and effeminate nationalist, and who most needed careful surveillance. Contrarily, the martial races “not only underwrote British power in India,” both in 1857 and 191

Expurgate

forthy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22875-1ly more tolerant than the one they envision. To be sure, the rhetoric of violence and masculinity is no artifact of bygone empires, but a revivified and catalytic agent in what Samuel P. Huntington called a “clash of civilizations.” The stakes in doing “New Imperial History” are higher than ever; we

駁船

nd India‘s postwar fitness for self-rule. This study demonstrates that increasingly ferocious dispute culminated in the actual physical violence of the Amritsar Massacre of 1919.978-1-349-49650-1978-1-137-44854-5

confide