Titlebook: Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948; Ornella Moscucci Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Britain.England.E

Taylor

書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948被引頻次




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948年度引用




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948讀者反饋




書目名稱Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

充足

The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

colostrum

免除責(zé)任

Electrodynamics of concentrated drop flows,nd public health concern in England. The volume examines not only the contribution made by gynaecologists themselves to the development of cancer control policies, but also the part played by others concerned with the gynaecological cancers: radiotherapists, pathologists, voluntary organizations, pu

AXIOM

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137395511analysis: women’s liability to cancer of the uterus and breast served to confirm that their bodies were different because their reproductive functions made them so. Moscucci examines medical explanations of gender differentials in cancer mortality against the backdrop of changing ideas about cancer’

Aromatic

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514300d radical surgery. Moscucci examines the origins of this approach by exploring debates about cancer’s curability. She argues that radical surgery did not in fact work as well as anticipated, and that uterine cancer’s status as a hopeful disease essentially depended on new ways of rationalizing thera

Aromatic

Sigmoidoscopy

W. K. Melville,M. R. Loewen,Eric Lamarreoscucci focuses on women doctors’ contribution to the nascent specialty of radiotherapy, setting it in the context of discussions about the organization of radium research, and controversies over the relative merits of surgery vs. radium therapy. Debates about the results of treatment importantly le

無意

GRAVE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5781-0r the prevention of penile cancer. Moscucci traces this history by linking the rise of prophylactic cancer surgery with the development of other preventive surgeries such as tonsillectomy. The chapter focuses on the management of cancer risk in women, but it also discusses the role of male circumcis