Titlebook: Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance; Global Challenges, G Heike Kahlert Book 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018 Geschl

GLAZE

書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance被引頻次




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance年度引用




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance讀者反饋




書目名稱Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

即席演說

辭職

詼諧

BMI/BCI Modeling and Signal Processing,is is done using the example of Estonia, where the neo-liberal ideology (more broadly) and its implementation in universities is widely regarded as common sense and rarely challenged. In this article we consider how feminist scholars in Estonia both accommodate and challenge the corporatisation of u

Harpoon

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55891-0edeploys core-periphery relations, creating market-based and developmentalist knowledge-producing networks that pose distinctive challenges for feminists in different geopolitical spaces. By analysing the location of current feminist work in South African universities, this article considers how an

刺穿

Neural Recording Front-End Design,s context of the new governance of science, research is expected to actively interact with society and to be involved in transdisciplinary problem-solving in close collaboration with various social actors (Slaughter and Leslie 1997; Gibbons et al. 1994; Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1998). The article p

刺穿

STEER

Neuropsychological Model?of Human Behaviorunding to research and development to publication policies, and to the assessment of the impact of scientific knowledge and technical products in society. But how can these initiatives be assessed relative to the call for a new governance of science and technology by inter-disciplinary research? The

jeopardize

Das Gehirn von Menschen und Schimpansen, we claim that throughout its development and particularly in its struggle with mainstream academia and science governance to contest its scientific marginalisation, this portion of the feminist field ended up producing some other exclusions of its own. Thus, and unintentionally, it contributed to p

amplitude

Mircea Steriade,Robert W. McCarleynder and feminist studies (WGFS). Through that research, they have generated valuable knowledge about the patterns and profiles of WGFS’ institutionalisation, and the actors and factors that shape it. In this article, I review that literature and systematise some of its key findings. I then draw on